Remaining TODOs: 1
1. Groups
Definition 1.1: Let be a set. A binary operation on is a function .
We define .
Lemma 1.6: Let be a binary operation on .
- If are identity elements, then .
- If is an identity element, , is associative, and are inverses of under , then .
Proof:
Example (symmetry group):
Proposition 1.9:
Proof: Suppose
is injective:π β π ( π β π ) ( π₯ ) = ( π β π ) ( π¦ ) βΉ π ( π ( π₯ ) ) = π ( π ( π¦ ) ) βΉ π ( π₯ ) = π ( π¦ ) βΉ π₯ = π¦ is surjective:π β π β π₯ β π , β π¦ β π s.t. π§ = π ( π¦ ) β π₯ β π s.t. π¦ = π ( π₯ ) βΉ π§ = π ( π ( π₯ ) ) = ( π β π ) ( π₯ ) .
So
Composition is associative.
We have an identity,
We have inverses:
Example (fields):
Let
Then
For example,
Also
Example (matrices):
Let
Example:
Definition 1.12: Let
Let
Proposition 1.13:
Proof: Necessary to prove:
Associativity is inherited from the symmetric group.
Let
Proposition 1.16 (Subgroup Test): Let
π β π» β π₯ , π¦ β π» , π₯ π¦ β 1 β π»
Proof:
β
Assume
β
(i)
Apply (ii) with
So
Example: Let
Let
.π β€ π = π βΉ π β π ( π ) π , π β π ( π ) βΉ ( π π β 1 ) β€ ( π π β 1 ) = ( π β 1 ) β€ π β€ π π β 1 = ( π β 1 ) β€ π β 1 = ( π β€ ) β 1 π β 1 = ( π π β€ ) β 1 = π β 1 ( π β€ π = π βΉ π π β€ = π for square π ) = π
Hence by the subgroup test,
Also
Definition 1.19: Let
The product group is
Lemma 1.20: The product of two groups is a group.
Proof: Associativity is easy.
The inverse of
Definition 1.21: Let
Example:
Definition 1.22:
This is the infinite cyclic group.
Definition 1.23:For
Definition 1.25: Let
The dihedral group
that is, it is the group of distance-preserving transformations that stabilise the regular
We denote the rotation by
Proposition 1.26:
Proof: Suppose
If
If
Now let
Hence
Now
TODO finish this off
Definition 1.29: Let
If there is an isomorphism between
Definition 1.30: For a group
If
Lemma 1.31: If
Proof:
First we show that
Then
Hence
2. Permutation groups
Remark: We write permutations on the right, i.e. if
This means that composition is backwards from the usual order.
Definition 2.1: A cycle is a permutation
We denote this cycle as
Lemma 2.2: Disjoint cycles commute.
Proof: Let
Let
Theorem 2.3: Every
Moreover, this factorisation is unique up to cycling of elements within cycles, and order of (commuting) factors.